Ways to Overcome Dagestani Students’ Lexical Interference
https://doi.org/10.31161/1995-0659-2022-16-1-2-42-46
Abstract
The aim is to identify ways to overcome the difficulties caused by native languages that Dagestani students face when studying the vocabulary of the Russian language.
Methods. The study of scientific and methodological literature, observation, generalization of the experience of teaching Russian to Dagestani students.
Results. Russian vocabulary in the Dagestan audience should be studied taking into account the specifics of the native language of the students, which will help them to understand the peculiarities of the Russian language, while differentiating exercises based on interlanguage opposition should occupy a significant place. Typical vocabulary exercises are conditional translation, analysis of the semantics of words and phrases in comparison with words and phrases of the native language, communicative exercises for the use of learned words in speech practice.
Conclusions. To prevent obvious interference and gradual transition from simplified use of the means of the Russian language to a free and flexible command of them, it is important for students to understand the specifics of the studied and native languages. The considered methods of work contribute to the prevention of errors caused by the influence of the native language of students. The most significant are the differentiating exercises that eliminate underdifferentiation and overdifferentiation.
About the Author
G. M. Magomed-Kasumov
Dagestan State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grozbek M. Magomed-Kasumov, Ph. D. (Pedagogy), professor, the chair of Theory and Methods of Teaching Russian and Literature
Makhachkala
References
1. Karlinsky E. A. Principy issledovaniya leksicheskoj interferencii [Principles of lexical interference research]. Zarubezhnoe yazykoznanie i literatura, Alma-Ata, 1971, pp. 62–70 (in Russian).
2. Krasil'shchikova L. I. K voprosu ob ustojchivosti pervonachal'nyh svyazej v processah pamyati [To the question of the stability of primary connections in memory processes]. Voprosy psikhologii, 1956, no. 6, pp. 65–82 (in Russian).
3. Magomed-Kasumov G. M. Obuchenie russkoj leksike uchashchihsya-dagestancev [Teaching Russian vocabulary to Dagestani students]. Russkij yazyk v dagestanskoj shkole, 2000, no. 1, pp. 7–12 (in Russian).
4. Mitrofanova O. D. O metodicheskih i psihologicheskih trebovaniyah k sisteme uprazhnenij po russkomu yazyku [On the methodological and psychological requirements for the system of exercises in the Russian language]. Russkij yazyk dlya studentov-inostrancev, iss. 12, Moscow, Vysshaya Shkola, 1972 (in Russian).
5. Formirovanie znanij i umenij na osnove poetapnogo usvoeniya umstvennyh dejstvij [Formation of knowledge and skills based on the stage-by-stage assimilation of mental actions]. Ed. by P. Ya. Galperin and N. F. Talyzina, Moscow, Moscow University Press, 1968, 135 p. (in Russian)
6. Schwartz L. M. Interferenciya i uprazhneniya [Interference and exercise]. Scientific notes of the State Research Institute of Psychology, vol. 2, Moscow, 1941, pp. 193–216 (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Magomed-Kasumov G.M. Ways to Overcome Dagestani Students’ Lexical Interference. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2022;16(1-2):42-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31161/1995-0659-2022-16-1-2-42-46
Views:
36
Email this article 