Социопсихолингвистический механизм формирования и развития билингвальных компетенций в условиях гетерогенного этноязыкового пространства Дагестана

Цель статьи – раскрыть дидактические основы формирования и развития билингвальных компетенций через социопсихолингвистический механизм в гетерогенных условиях этноязыкового Дагестана.

Методы. Коррелятивный анализ.

Результат. Дидактическая процессуальность речевой деятельности дагестанской языковой личности в контексте национально-русского двуязычия обусловлена социопсихолингвистическими факторами и должна опираться на данные лингвокоррелятивного анализа.

Вывод. Лингвистический корпус данных, полученных в результате коррелятивного анализа различных уровней сопоставляемых (русского и литературных дагестанских) языков, является лингводидактической основой образовательной технологии преодоления интерферентных ошибок в русской и родной речи дагестанцев-билингвов.

1. Akhmedov G. I. (1999). Communicative types of utterance in the Lezgi language (in comparison with Russian). Ph. D. dissertation, Moscow State Linguistics University.

2. Akhmedov G. I. Phonologische Methode beim Studium der Dagestanischen Sprachen. Proceedings of the Eighth Caucasian Colloquim. Leiden University. Р. 4.

3. Barsuk R. Yu. (1970). Fundamentals of teaching a foreign language in bilingualism.

4. Bernstein S. I. (1975). Questions of pronunciation training in relation to the teaching of the Russian language to foreigners. In Bernstein S. I. Questions of phonetics and pronunciation training. Р. 7.

5. Blyagoz Z. U. (1977). Bilingualism and the culture of Russian speech.

6. Christian D. (2016). Dual Language Education: Current Research Perspectives, International Multilingual Research Journal, 10:1, 1-5. (2010). English and Spanish ‘para un futuro’ – or just English? Immigrant family perspectives on two-way immersion, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13:3, 303-323.

7. Fomin M. M. (1998). Teaching a foreign language in the conditions of multilingualism (bilingualism). Moscow.

8. Freeland J. (1996). The Global, the National and the Local: forces in the development of education for indigenous peoples – the case of Peru, Compare. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 26:2, 167-195.

9. Henderson K. I. (2019). The danger of the dual-language enrichment narrative: Educator discourses constructing exclusionary participation structures in bilingual education, Critical Inquiry in Language Studies,16:3, 155-177.

10. Imedadze N. V. (1959). On the interaction of language systems in the process of simultaneous possession of two languages. Tbilisi.

11. Imedadze N. V. (1981). Questions of modern psychology. Tbilisi.

12. Inbar-Lourie O. & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (2019). EMI Lecturers in international universities: is a native / non-native English-speaking background relevant? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.

13. Jakubowicz A. (1988). The celebration of (moderate) diversity in a racist society: Multiculturalism and Education in Australia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 8:2, 37-75.

14. Khanazarov K. Kh. (1982). The solution of the national language problem in the USSR. Moscow: Politizdat.

15. Kirzhaev V. P. (1995). Principles of teaching the Russian language in the Mordovian school. Accounting for the features of the native language: a training manual. Moscow State University.

16. Kleyn T. & Reyes Sh. A. (2011). Nobody said it would be easy: ethnolinguistic group challenges to bilingual and multicultural education in New York City. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14:2, 207-224.

17. Leontiev A. A. (1965). Word in speech activity. In Leont'ev A. A. Some problems of the general theory of speech activity. Moscow: Nauka.

18. Leontiev A. A. (1970). Phase structure of a speech act and the nature of plans. In Leontiev A. A. & Ryabova T. V. Plans and models of the future in speech (materials for discussion). Tbilisi.

19. Li H., Wu D., Liang L. & Jing M. (2019). Predicting Chinese and English interrogative development in a multilingual context: a corpusbased study of Singapore preschoolers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.

20. López M. M. & Mendoza M. A. (2013). We Need to “Catch Them Before They Fall”: Response to Intervention and Elementary Emergent Bilinguals. Multicultural Perspectives, 15:4, 194-201.

21. Magomedova T. I. (2009). Russianspeaking professional communicative competence of students of a juridical department: model and technology of competence formation in a multilingual setting. Ph.D. dissertation, Dagestan State University.

22. Magomedova T. I. (2019). Didactic technology of linguistic correction of Russian speech in the conditions of the Dagestan multilingualism: a study guide. Makhachkala: Alef.

23. Pérez Cañado M. L. (2016). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: in-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19:3, 266-295.

24. Sarda A. & Bhattacharya U. (2019). The Multilingual Reality: Living with Languages. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.

25. Schukin A. N. (1982). Means of teaching Russian as a foreign language. Moscow.

26. Trubetskoy N. S. (1960). Fundamentals of Phonology. Moscow: Foreign literature.

27. Tuboglo M. N. (1987). Factors and development trends of bilingualism of the Russian population living in the union republics. In Tuboglo M. N. History of the USSR (vol. 2). Р. 47.

28. Zimnaya I. A. (2001). Educational Psychology: a textbook for high schools. Moscow: Logos.