MOTIVATIONAL AND VOLITIONAL FEATURES OF THE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ METACOGNITION
Abstract
The article shows the role of metacognition in the learning process of students of the university. Еmpirically observed differences will self-regulation and the motivational sphere of personality students with high and low levels of expression of the components of metacognition were described. It is shown that high selfesteem of metacognitive activity is closely related to the academic progress of students of high school, with indicators of will self-regulation, with the focus on students' motivation professional, educational, creative and self-actualization needs.
About the Authors
Y. V. Poshekhonova
P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Psychology, assistant professor, the chair of Pedagogy and Pedagogical Psychology, P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Psychology, assistant professor, the chair of Pedagogy and Pedagogical Psychology, P. G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University
A. V. Karpov
Yaroslavl State University
Russian Federation
member-correspondent, Russian Academy of Education, Honored scientist of Russian Federation, Honored worker of Higher school of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Psychology, the Dean of the faculty of Psychology, professor, the chair of Labour and Organizational Psychology, YaroYugoslavl State University;
Russian Federation
member-correspondent, Russian Academy of Education, Honored scientist of Russian Federation, Honored worker of Higher school of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Psychology, the Dean of the faculty of Psychology, professor, the chair of Labour and Organizational Psychology, YaroYugoslavl State University;
References
1. Dalgatov M. M., Kimpaeva E. A. Causal attribution of achievements and success of educational activity of students // Proceedings of Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. # 1 (22), 2013. P. 8-12.
2. Diagnosis of will self-control (VSC questionnaire) // Practicum in psycho-diagnostics. Psychodiagnostics motivation and self-regulation. M., 1990. P. 116-124.
3. Karpov A. V. Metasystems organization tier structures of mentality. M. : IE RAS, 2004.
4. Kashapov M. M Cognitive and metacognitive understanding of the structural and dynamic characteristics of a creative professional thinking // Professional creative activity in the context of cognitive and metacognitive approaches. Monograph / ed. prof. Kashapov M. M, assistant professor Y. V. Poshekhonova. YrSU. Yaroslavl, 2012. P. 35-121.
5. Kashapov M. M. Skvortsova Y. V. Development of a technique metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive activity self-assessment // Yaroslavl psychological bulletin. # 14. M.-Yaroslavl, "Russian Psychological Society", 2005. P. 65-70.
6. Ogorodova T. V., Medvedeva Yu. S. Science: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Motivational aspect // Many Voices - One World: Collection of scientific papers of young scientists dedicated to the All-Russian Youth Scientific Conference psychological "Many Voices - One World" (Psychology in the mirror interdisciplinary approach) / ed. prof. A. V. Karpov. Yaroslavl: NPC "Psychodiagnostics", 2012. Vol. 2. P. 24-26.
7. Kholodnaya M. A. Psychology of Intelligence. Paradoxes of the study. SPb. : Piter, 2002. 272 p.
8. Shadrikov V. D. Intellectual operations. M. : Logos, 2006. 107 p.
9. Shadrikov V. D. Abilities and human intelligence. M. : Publishing House of the SSU, 2004.
10. BerardiColetta B., Dominowski R. L., Buyer L. S., & Rellinger E. R. Metacognition and problem solving: A processoriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995. V. 21. P. 205-223.
11. Biryukov P. Metacognitive Aspects of Solving Combinatorics Problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2005. P. 3–19.
12. Clause C. S., Delbridge K. et al. Test Preparation Activities and Employment Test Performance // Human Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Assistants, Inc. # 14 (2). 2001. Р. 149–167.
13. Flavell J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 1979. V. 34. P. 906–911.
14. O’Neil H. F. Jr., Abedi J. Reliskill and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 1996. V. 89. P. 234-245.
Review
For citations:
Poshekhonova Y.V., Karpov A.V. MOTIVATIONAL AND VOLITIONAL FEATURES OF THE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ METACOGNITION. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2014;(4):27-32. (In Russ.)
Views:
106
Email this article 