DIAGNOSTICS OF DIALOGUE: BEHAVIOR OF THE SCHOOLCHILDREN IN CONFLICT SITUATIONS AND THEIR ATTITUDE TO THE EXTREMIST ACTIONS
Abstract
About the Author
E. B. ErmolaevaLatvia
Doctor of Pedagogy, associated professor, High School of Economy and Culture; leading researcher, Riga Academy of Pedagogy and Management of Education
References
1. Bakhtin M. M. The Problem of genres // Collected Works in 7 volumes. V. 5. M. : Publishing House “Russian dictionaries”. 1997. P. 159-206.
2. Buber M. Problem of a man // Two ways of faith. Thinkers of the 20th century: transl. from german. M. : Republic. 1995. P. 157-232.
3. Golubev N. K. Methodology and methods of socio-pedagogical diagnostics. SPb. : Kultinformpress, 2001. 188 p.
4. Ermolaeva E. The problem of the development of the ability to dialogue with the metaphorical interlocutor. V. 33, 2011. P. 133-142.
5. Orlov D. U., Pigrov K. S., Sekatskaya A. K. Dialogue in education: Collection of materials of conference. Series “Symposium”. Issue 22. SPb. : SaintPetersburg philosophical society, 2002. 350 p.
6. Ermolaeva E. Dialogical approach in modern educational process: Abst. of diss. … Cand. of Pedagogy.
7. Matusov E. Journey into dialogic pedagogy. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc., 2009.
8. Sidorkin A. M. Beyond Discourse: Education, the Self, and Dialogue. NewYork, 1999.
9. Wegerif R. Dialogic Education: what is it and why do we need it? // Education Review. Vol. 19. 2006. P. 58-67.
Review
For citations:
Ermolaeva E.B. DIAGNOSTICS OF DIALOGUE: BEHAVIOR OF THE SCHOOLCHILDREN IN CONFLICT SITUATIONS AND THEIR ATTITUDE TO THE EXTREMIST ACTIONS. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2014;(1):68-73. (In Russ.)