FEATURES OF THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY MOTIVATION OF EMPLOYEES IN R & D COMMERCIAL FIRMS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WORK
Abstract
About the Authors
A. V. KarpovRussian Federation
member-correspondent, Russian Academy of Education, Honored scientist of Russian Federation, Honored worker of Higher school of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Psychology, the Dean of the faculty of Psychology, professor, the chair of Labour and Organizational Psychology, YaroYugoslavl State University
T. V. Razina
Russian Federation
Candidate of Psychology, the head of the chair of General Psychology, Syktyvkar State University
References
1. Dalgatov M. M., Djamaludinova A. G. The problem of personal values and value orientations in the psychological studies // Poceedings of Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, # 3 (24), 2013. P. 14-19.
2. Dalgatov M. M., Magomedova N. T. The axiological and conceptual sphere and students’ disadaptive behavior // Proceedings of Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, № 2 (23), 2013. P. 10-15.
3. Karpov A. V., Yakovleva N. V. Study motivation of health-activity as subsystems person vital metakompetenсе // Proceedings of Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, # 1 (26), 2014. P. 11-16.
4. Pelz D., Andrews F. Scientists in organizations. On the optimal conditions for research and development. M. Acad Progress, 1973, 471 p.
5. Razina T. V. Psychology of motivation research: methodology, theory, empirical studies: Monograph. Syktyvkar: Publisher SyktSU, 2014. 296 p.
6. Amabile T. M., R. Conti. "Environmental Determinants of Work Motivation, Creativity, and Innovation: The Case of R&D Downsizing." In R.Garud, P. R. Nayyar, & Z. B. Shapira (Eds), Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights (pp.111-125). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
7. Boudreau K. J., Lacetera N., Lakhani K. R. Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis. Managememt Science. Vol. 57, No. 5, May 2011. P. 843–863.
8. Feist G. J. The Development of Scientific Talent in Westinghouse Finalists and Members of the National Academy of Sciences Journal of Adult Development, Vol. 13, No. 1, March 2006 P. 23-35.
9. Hrakhouskaya M., van Schuppen H-J. Development of a conceptual framework of motivators for professionals in a multicultural organization with a hybrid R&D structure: How to avoid carrot manadjement. Spring 2011. URL: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:456091/ATTACHMENT01 (27.07.2014).
10. McAllister R. B., Vandlen C. E. (2010, October 30). Motivating employees in R&D. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved from Cornell University, ILR School site: URL: http://digitalcommons. ilr.cornell.edu/chrr/17 [8.08.2014].
11. Smith D. R., Di Tomaso N., Farris G. F., Cordero R. Favoritism, Bias, and Error in Performance Ratings of Scientists and Engineers: The Effects of Power, Status, and Numbers / Sex Roles, Vol. 45, Nos. 5/6, Sept. 2001. P. 337-358.
12. Wierzbicki A. P., Nakamori Y. Creative Environments Issues of Creativity Support for the Knowledge Civilization Age /Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 59, 2007. 509 р.
Review
For citations:
Karpov A.V., Razina T.V. FEATURES OF THE SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY MOTIVATION OF EMPLOYEES IN R & D COMMERCIAL FIRMS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WORK. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2014;(4):15-20. (In Russ.)