Impact of Education on the Economic Development of Country
https://doi.org/10.31161/1995-0675-2021-15-2-109-112
Abstract
The aim of the article is to analyze the impact of education on the economic development of the country.
Methods. Analysis of scientific literature, generalization, observation.
Results. Education is not only an important symbol of human civilization and progress, but also an important driving force of social and economic development. Future of mankind and prosperity of society depend on education within the advent of the era of digitalization. Authors pay attention to the relationship between educational structure and economic development of the country. The relationship between the process of modernization of education in China and the country's economy is considered as an example. Economic growth is associated with the level of education and the introduction of information technologies into the educational process such as big data, cloud-computing, artificial intelligence, etc.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that modernization of education promotes practical significance for economic development.
About the Authors
W. Zhao
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Weili Zhao - рostgraduate, the chair of Economics
Rostov-on-Don
A. S. Gamisonija
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Astanda S. Gamisonija - applicant, the chair of Education and Pedagogical Sciences, Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy, SFEDU.
Rostov-on-Don
E. N. Tolstyuk
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina N. Tolstyuk - master student, the chair of Education and Pedagogical Sciences, Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy, SFEDU.
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Bubnov Y. A., Gaidar K. M., Fedorov V. A., Berezhnaya I. F., & Galustyan O. V. (2018). Organization of the training process based on modular and rating technology at higher educational institution. Espacios. No. 39 (25).
2. Galustyan O. V., Berezhnaya I. F., & Beloshitsky A. V. (2017). Professional and career development of teachers. Sodobna Pedagogika. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies. No. 68 (4). Pp. 158-172.
3. Galustyan O. V., Borovikova Y. V., Polivaeva N. P., Kodirov, B. R., & Zhirkova G. P. (2019). Elearning within the field of andragogy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. No. 14 (9). Pp. 148-156.
4. Galustyan O. V., Gaidar K. M., Aleshina S. A., Ksenofontova A. N., & Ledeneva A. V. (2018). Development of group subjectivity of pupils within collaborative activities. TEM Journal. No. 7 (4). Pp. 854-858.
5. Kravchenko E. V., Galustyan O. V., Kovtunenko L. V., & Kolosova L. A. (2018). Pedagogical practice of students. Espacios, 39, 17.
6. Lin J. Y. (2017). New structural economics and industrial policies for catching-up economies. Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. Pp. 183-199.
7. Lin J. Y. (2011). New structural economics: a framework for rethinking development. The World Bank Research Observer. No. 26 (2). Pp. 193-221.
8. Prichett L. (1996) “Mind your p’s and q’s: The cost of public investment is not the value of public capital. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No. 1660
9. Schelleman-Offermans K., & Massar, K. (2021). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in self-reported health outcomes: The mediating role of perceived life stress, financial self-reliance, psychological capital, and time perspective orientations. PLoS ONE, 15 (12 December).
10. Seshadri A., & Manuelli, R.E. (2014). Human capital and the wealth of nations. American Economic Review. No. 104 (9). Pp. 2736-2762.
11. Vandenbussche J., Aghion P., &Meghir C. (2006). Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital. Journal of Economic Growth. No. 11 (2). Pp. 97-127.
12. Wang L. (2013). Equity in Higher Education: Double Thinking of Progress and Results. Social Science Front, (1). Pp. 277-278.
13. Xie H. Q., Yang M. M., &Li F. (2018). An empirical study on the correlation between educational input and upgrading of industrial structure under the background of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development. Educational SciencesTheory and Practice. No. 18 (5). Pp. 2519-2526.
14. Yao S., Shi X.N. (2019). Difference of Regional Economic Development Level, Education Inequality and Government Intervention. Higher Education Research, (4). Pp. 84-85.
Review
For citations:
Zhao W., Gamisonija A.S., Tolstyuk E.N. Impact of Education on the Economic Development of Country. Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Journal. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2021;15(2):109-112. https://doi.org/10.31161/1995-0675-2021-15-2-109-112
Views:
35
Email this article 